<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://indianlawlive.net/2026/06/05/survey-authorities-do-not-decide-title/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Saji Koduvath Associates</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-05T14:57:06+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Survey and Revenue Authorities Do Not Decide TITLE</news:title><news:keywords>documents, mutation for fiscal purpose, mutation for fiscal purposes, title, revenue records, confer title, title deeds, Survey, Survey Authorities, title and possession, ownership, cochin, Property, Fiscal Purposes, Union of India, proof of title, Civil Court, properties, presume, plans, identified, Kunnool Balakrishnan, Not, no title conferred, resurvey, Decide Title, N.K. Balakrishnan, accurate, maps, Kathirummal Chirammal Karthyayani, resurvey plan, Entry in the resurvey, Not Confer Title, lose title, resurvey records, Devaswom Board, Cochin Devaswom Board, revenue authorities, civil courts, fiscal purpose</news:keywords></news:news></url><url><loc>https://indianlawlive.net/2026/06/05/is-section-634-certificate-absolutely-necessary-for-admitting-a-photograph-in-a-court-case/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Saji Koduvath Associates</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-04T15:53:15+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Is a Section 63(4) Certificate an Essential Prerequisite for the Admission of a Photograph (Computer output) in Evidence?</news:title></news:news></url></urlset>
