https://indianlawlive.net/2026/07/21/tharammel-peethambaran-vs-t-ushakrishnan-pankaj-mithal-s-v-n-bhatti-jj-air-2026-sc-938-a-classic-decision-on-secondary-evidence/Saji Koduvath Associatesen2026-07-21T01:41:35+00:00Tharammel Peethambaran vs T. Ushakrishnan, Pankaj Mithal, S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ.,  AIR 2026 SC 938: A Classic Decision on Secondary Evidencehttps://indianlawlive.net/2026/07/20/jaspal-singh-v-ashwani-kumar-earnest-money-refund-clause-does-not-bar-specific-performance-unless-it-is-a-substitute-for-sale/Saji Koduvath Associatesen2026-07-20T04:02:59+00:00Jaspal Singh v. Ashwani Kumar: Earnest Money Refund Clause Does Not Bar Specific Performance unless it is a Substitute for Saleearnest money, fraud, specific performance, share, First Appellate Court, Suspicious Circumstance, Substitute for Sale, Refund, co-owner, findings of facts, Suit for Specific Performance, collateral transaction, Clause for refund, findings of fact, High Court, penalty, specific, sp. performance., performance, ready and willing, agreementhttps://indianlawlive.net/2026/07/19/venkatesha-v-km-venkatamuniyappa-a-rectification-deed-cannot-in-the-guise-of-correcting-an-error-substitute-the-very-subject-matter/Saji Koduvath Associatesen2026-07-19T11:58:26+00:00Venkatesha v. KM Venkatamuniyappa: A Rectification Deed Cannot, in the Guise of Correcting an Error, Substitute the Very Subject MatterProperty, Report, nemo dat quod non habet, Declaration of Title, Rectification Deed, Supreme Court, Commissioner, error, Venkatamuniyappa, Venkatesha, K.M. Venkatamuniyappa, Legal Principles, 2026 INSC 705, Alter Subject Matter, S. 26, Survey Records, Identity, Vipul M. Pancholi, No Person Can Convey, Dipankar Datta, SR Act, Establish His Own Case, Second Appeal, Substantial Question of Law, Revenue Entries, substitute, No Effort, Conduct, Better Title