https://indianlawlive.net/2026/07/19/venkatesha-v-km-venkatamuniyappa-a-rectification-deed-cannot-in-the-guise-of-correcting-an-error-substitute-the-very-subject-matter/Saji Koduvath Associatesen2026-07-19T11:58:26+00:00Venkatesha v. KM Venkatamuniyappa: A Rectification Deed Cannot, in the Guise of Correcting an Error, Substitute the Very Subject MatterProperty, Report, nemo dat quod non habet, Declaration of Title, Rectification Deed, Supreme Court, Commissioner, error, Venkatamuniyappa, Venkatesha, K.M. Venkatamuniyappa, Legal Principles, 2026 INSC 705, Alter Subject Matter, S. 26, Survey Records, Identity, Vipul M. Pancholi, No Person Can Convey, Dipankar Datta, SR Act, Establish His Own Case, Second Appeal, Substantial Question of Law, Revenue Entries, substitute, No Effort, Conduct, Better Title