https://indianlawlive.net/2026/07/21/tharammel-peethambaran-vs-t-ushakrishnan-pankaj-mithal-s-v-n-bhatti-jj-air-2026-sc-938-a-classic-decision-on-secondary-evidence/Saji Koduvath Associatesen2026-07-21T01:41:35+00:00Tharammel Peethambaran vs T. Ushakrishnan,  AIR 2026 SC 938: A Classic Decision on Secondary Evidencehttps://indianlawlive.net/2026/07/20/jaspal-singh-v-ashwani-kumar-earnest-money-refund-clause-does-not-bar-specific-performance-unless-it-is-a-substitute-for-sale/Saji Koduvath Associatesen2026-07-20T04:02:59+00:00Jaspal Singh v. Ashwani Kumar: Earnest Money Refund Clause Does Not Bar Specific Performance unless it is a Substitute for Saleearnest money, fraud, specific performance, share, First Appellate Court, Suspicious Circumstance, Substitute for Sale, Refund, co-owner, findings of facts, Suit for Specific Performance, collateral transaction, Clause for refund, findings of fact, High Court, penalty, specific, sp. performance., performance, ready and willing, agreement