Separation Of Powers: Who Wins the Race – Legislature, Executive or Judiciary ?

Saji Koduvath, Advocate.

the symbiosis of the three organs of State – legislature, executive and judiciary – shapes the structure of a political system. The polity where these three wings are operated by a single authority it is called autocracy. Separation of these three wings is essential for the endurance of democracy. Each one is expected to function independently, in its domain. Hence, in democracy, they are called the three pillars of democracy. When headship of two of these three organs is conferred upon one source of power it gives rise to despotism.

Diversities are the real strength

We, the people of India, declared ourselves as a Republic and adopted the democratic Constitution 71 years back. When power of administration of the nation was handed down to Indians by the British in 1947, doubts were raised from various corners as to the survival of democratic institutions in India.

Several people doubted that diversities of India were so grave and myriad that it could not thrive as one nation for long. But, we proved that we are one and united, despite the diversities; and that the diversities are the real strength for our nation. Credit for the same goes to the personalities and forces that united India as a nation.

Energy emanated by the freedom struggle movement under the powerful icon, Mahatma Gandhi, is the main source of power that made an ever united India. The patriotic voice of the national leaders emerged in the freedom struggle marks the second position. Then comes the effect of the vibrant Book of the Nation, the Constitution of India.   

The Constitution

The Constitution promised a lively democratic nation. It served as a strong-bedrock to build up the lawful and realistic dreams and aspirations of all citizens who are entitled to live in this country. It assured safety to all the inhabitants of this land. It founded a systematic administrative system that can protect the nation guarding against all possible adversities.

No doubt, it is true that India as a nation, during the past decades, performed far better thorough well than certain critiques thought about infant India during the middle of twentieth century. If we are required to point out the slip-ups upon the legislature, executive and judiciary, we may have to pin-point the following downsides.

Legislature

Legislature that consists of the elected representatives of the people is the most important organ of democracy. Whole nation, especially those who are near to the steering wheel of the nation, has to keep an eternal vigilance to protect the democracy.  If religion-based politics is practised by the people who are steering wheel of the nation, it will begin to ruin the democracy; and if the system is deteriorated so that the legislatures can be easily ‘purchased’, the country will lose its title as a democratic nation and it can no longer survive as an independent republic.

Evaluating the general performance of legislatures in India, if one opines that our elected representatives have not performed well upto the expected level, it will be a sheer truth.   Because of the over politicisation, most of the representatives have forgotten that law-making is their prime duty. They even fail to regularly attend the parliament or legislature whereby the houses are frequently adjourned for no quorum. Boisterous and unruly MPs and MLAs are a curse to the democracy. Such elected representatives deteriorate and degenerate the status of the legislatures.  

Several elected representatives, having political affiliations, speak as mouthpieces of their masters who may be the religious forces or wealthy ones who funded them in their elections. Most are not allowed to work independently for they are forced to express the opinions and views of the political pundits who may have hidden motives or who may be narrow minded.  In our system, the elected representatives are forced to face-guard the corrupt practices of the parties to which they belong and of the tainted political leaders.

Executive

Executive is primarily expected to implement the laws in force and function independently without being guided by the legislators, or the political leaders who side with the party in power. It is shameful that we cannot think of ‘independent’ appointments, termed now-a-days as ‘political appointments’, after celebrating 73 independence-anniversary, even in constitutional appointments such as Election Commission, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), Reserve Bank Governor etc..

Because of the conferment of actual executive power to the council of ministers, by our constitution, the executive is forced to function in accordance with the directions of the political aspirations of the parties in power. From experience we can say – police and various investigative agencies are the hand-maidens of political powers that be. We see change in the officers, from top to bottom, at least in certain departments, by the change of a ministry. Doesn’t it show – our executive is not independent as it was expected to be?

From experience we can realise – corruption is rampant in certain departments. No doubt, unless the god-fathers of such erring persons do not protect them, they cannot thrive and flourish in the present form they shaped themselves. That is, corrective-steps have to be begun from the top. 

It remains a fact – because of the intervention of judiciary, at least some major ‘political scandals’ and ‘political corruption’ are brought to light and at least some political-stalwarts are sent to jail after trial.  It is time to think – is not it necessary to liberate the executive wing of our nation from the clutches of the ‘political-executive’.

 From experience we can also realise – the police will be a threat to the citizens if that force is not controlled properly.  And, Excise-Tax- Registration departments will amass unless proper enacted laws are made to collect revenue properly and sufficient machinery is placed to trace the unerring officers. 

From experience we can definitely say – the ‘existing system’ promotes corruption in Excise-Custom-Tax-Revenue-Registration-Police-departments. It is a sheer fact that our high level political-masterminds do not want a change. Thy will not engage effective system to check the tax and revenue evaders.  There is only one reason for the same – that is, proper laws and simplification of the protracted procedures will stop, or at least reduce, corruption. The political-pundits will not allow to make proper Laws and Rules also with a view to safeguard the citizens of India, and to place a proper machinery to trace the unerring officers, in betterment of the nation.

Judiciary

The success of all establishments, especially judiciary, lies in the quality of persons who handle it. Independent judiciary is essential for proper working of democracy. Unqualified and petty elements that capture the high posts through front or back doors destroy the system. The appointment of proper persons in judiciary from top to bottom is essential for the strength of a democratic nation. The solicitors and other counsel for the government should also be appointed in a manner that they should not be guided by politicians or people in power.

Did our judiciary performed up-to-the-mark it was expected by the founders of our Constitution? Did the most important provision of the Constitution – Article 32 – is properly used-up by the persons who handled it? If the answer is no, the general grounds pointed out are the following:

1. Incompetence of some judges.
2. Forbearance from real issues, ignoring duty imposed upon them, by some judges.
3. Illegal association of some judges with, or their undue obligation to, political or religious gurus.

All accusations as to corruption within the judiciary may not have been proved and allegations as to over-smartness or as to indulgence in self-promoting acts against some judges may not be correct, yet, no doubt, the conferment of post-retirement ‘political appointments’ to some selected retired hands raises doubts, and such acts of conferment and its acceptance lowers the dignity of the Judiciary.

---

---

Read in this cluster (Click on the topic):

Civil Suits: Procedure & Principles

• Relevant provisions of Kerala Land Reforms Act (on Purchase Certificate,  Plantation-Exemption & Ceiling Area) in a Nutshell
• Kerala Land Reforms Act – Provisions on Plantation-Tenancy and Land-Tenancy
• Civil Rights and Jurisdiction of Civil Courts
• Production of Documents in Court: Order 11, Rule 14 CPC is not independent from Rule 12
• Best Evidence Rule in Indian Law
• Pleadings Should be Specific; Why?
• Order II, Rule 2 CPC – Not to Vex Defendants Twice for the Same Cause of Action
• Modes of Proof of Documents
• EFFECT OF MARKING DOCUMENTS WITHOUT OBJECTION
• PRODUCTION, ADMISSIBILITY & PROOF OF DOCUMENTS
• Does Alternate Remedy Bar Civil Suits and Writ Petitions?
• Void, Voidable, Ab Initio Void, Order Without Jurisdiction and Sham Transactions
• Res Judicata and Constructive Res Judicata
• When ‘Possession Follows Title’; When ‘Title Follows Possession’?
• Adverse Possession: Burden to Plead Sabotaged in Nazir Mohamed v. J. Kamala
• Can Courts Award Interest on Equitable Grounds?
• Notary Attested Power-of-Attorney is Sufficient for Registration of a Deed
• Sec. 91 CPC and Suits Against Wrongful Acts
• Remedies Under Sec. 92 CPC
• Mandatory Injunction – Law and Principles
• Declaration and Injunction
• Natural Justice – Not an Unruly Horse, Cannot be Placed in a Straight-Jacket & Not a Judicial Cure-all.
• Unstamped & Unregistered Documents and Collateral Purpose
• Interrogatories: When Court Allows, When Rejects?
• Can a Party to Suit Examine Opposite Party, as of Right?
• Is Permission of Court Mandatory when a Power of Attorney Holder Files Suit
• Adverse Possession: An Evolving Concept
• ‘Sound-mind’ and ‘Unsound-Mind’ in Indian Contract Act and other Civil Laws
• Forfeiture of Earnest Money and Reasonable Compensation
• Who has to fix Damages in Tort and Contract?
• Notary-Attested Documents: Presumption, Rebuttable
• Is Decree in a Representative Suit (OI R8 CPC) Enforceable Against Persons Not Eo-Nomine Parties?

Evidence Act

• EFFECT OF MARKING DOCUMENTS WITHOUT OBJECTION
• Sec. 65B Evidence Act Simplified
• Oral Evidence on Contents of Document, Irrelevant
• ‘STATEMENTS’ alone can be proved by ‘CERTIFICATE’ under Sec. 65B Evidence Act.
• OBJECTIONS TO ADMISSIBILITY & PROOF OF DOCUMENTS
• Sections 65A & 65B, Evidence Act and Arjun Panditrao: in Nutshell
• Sec. 65B, Evidence Act: Arjun Paditrao Criticised.
• Expert Evidence and Appreciation of Evidence
• How to Contradict a Witness under Sec. 145, Evidence Act
• Rules on Burden of proof and Adverse Inference
• Presumptions on Documents and Truth of its Contents
• Best Evidence Rule in Indian Law
• Sec. 65B,  Evidence Act: Certificate for Computer Output
• Notary-Attested Documents: Presumption, Rebuttable
• Significance of Scientific Evidence in Judicial Process
• Certificate is Required Only for ‘Computer Output’; Not for ‘Electronic Records’: Arjun Panditrao Explored.
• Presumptions on Registered Documents & Collateral Purpose
• Substantive Documents, and Documents used for Refreshing Memory and Contradicting Witnesses
• Polygraphy, Narco Analysis and Brain Mapping Tests in Criminal Investigation
• Relevancy, Admissibility and Proof of Documents

Constitution

• Mullaperiyar Dam: Disputes and Adjudication of Legal Issues
• No Reservation to Muslim and Christian SCs/STs (Dalits) Why? What are the Counter Arguments?
• Sabarimala Review Petitions & Reference to 9-Judge Bench
• Secularism and Art. 25 & 26 of the Indian Constitution
• Judicial & Legislative Activism in India: Principles and Instances
• Maratha Backward Community Reservation Case: Supreme Court Fixed Upper Limit at 50%.
• Separation Of Powers: Who Wins the Race – Legislature, Executive or Judiciary ?
• ‘Ban on Muslim Women to Enter Mosques, Unconstitutional’ Stands Tagged-on with Sabarimala Revision-Reference Matter
• Parsi Women – Excommunication for Marrying Outside, Unconstitutional
• Article 370: Is There Little Chance for Supreme Court Interference
• Ayodhya Disputes: M. Siddiq Vs. Mahant Suresh Das –Pragmatic Verdict on
• Kesavananda Bharati Case: Effect and Outcome – Never Ending Controversy
• Polygraphy, Narco Analysis and Brain Mapping Tests in Criminal Investigation
• CAA Challenge: Divergent Views
• Secularism & Freedom of Religion in Indian Panorama
• Can Legislature Overpower Court Decisions by an Enactment?
• Separation Of Powers: Who Wins the Race – Legislature, Executive or Judiciary ?

Contract Act

• ‘Sound-mind’ and ‘Unsound-Mind’ in Indian Contract Act and other Civil Laws
• Forfeiture of Earnest Money and Reasonable Compensation
• Who has to fix Damages in Tort and Contract?

Easement

• What is Easement? Does Right of Easement Allow to ‘Enjoy’ After Making a Construction?
• What is “period ending within two years next before the institution of the suit” in Easement by Prescription?
• Is the Basis of Every Easement, Theoretically, a Grant
• Extent of Easement (Width of Way) in Easement of Necessity, Quasi Easement and Implied Grant
• Village Pathways and Right to Bury are not Easements.
• Custom & Customary Easements in Indian Law
• ‘Additional Burden Loses Lateral Support’ – Incorrect Proposition

Club/Society

• State-Interference in Affairs of Societies & Clubs
• Election & Challenge in Societies and Clubs
• Rights & Liabilities of Members of Clubs and Societies
• Suits By or Against Societies, Clubs and Companies
• How to Sue Societies, Clubs and Companies
• Court’s Jurisdiction to Interfere in the Internal Affairs of a Club or Society
• Vesting of Property in Societies and Clubs
• Legal Personality of Trustees and Office Bearers of Societies
• Incidents of Trust in Clubs and Societies.
• Management of Societies and Clubs, And Powers of General Body and Governing Body
• Court Interference in Election Process
• Clubs and Societies, Bye Laws Fundamental
• Juristic Personality of Societies and Clubs
• Societies and Branches
• Effect of Registration of Societies and Incorporation of Clubs
• Clubs and Societies: General Features

Trusts/Religion

• Suits By or Against Trusts and Trustees
• Breach of Trust and Removal of Trustees
• Trustees and Administration of Public Trusts
• Business by Charitable Trusts & Institutions
• Alienation of Public Trust Property
• Remedies Under Sec. 92 CPC
• Philosophy of Idol Worship
• Vesting of Property in Public Trusts: in Nutshell
• Dedication of Property in Public Trusts
• Is an Idol a Perpetual Minor?
• Legal Personality of Temples, Gurudwaras, Churches and Mosques
• Public & Private Trusts in India.
• What is Trust in Indian Law?
• Incidents of Trust in Clubs and Societies
• Vesting of Property in Trusts
• Indian Law of Trusts Does Not Accept Salmond, as to Dual Ownership
• Ayodhya Disputes: M. Siddiq Vs. Mahant Suresh Das –Pragmatic Verdict
• Sabarimala Review Petitions & Reference to 9-Judge Bench
• Secularism and Art. 25 & 26 of the Indian Constitution
• Secularism & Freedom of Religion in Indian Panorama
• ‘Muslim Women: Is Ban to Enter Mosques, Unconstitutional’ Stands Tagged-on with Sabarimala Revision-Reference Matter
• Parsi Women Excommunication for Marrying Outside, Unconstitutional.
• Extinction, Discharge, Revocation, Variation etc. of Public Trusts
• Trust is ‘An Obligation’; Not a Legal Entity
• State & Court – Protectors of All Charities