
IndianLawLive
How to Subscribe Free
- Go to bottom of this page.
- Write Your Email Address in the column and Click the button “Subscribe”.
How to add ‘IndianLawLive‘ to Home Screen of Your Mobile Phone?
- 1. Click on the three DOTS (…) on the Right-Side Top of this Page.
- 2. Click “Add to Home Screen”.
How to Find an Article in ‘IndianLawLive’?
- In Google-Search, give (i) the “required word” or “phrase” and also (ii) “Koduvath” – in Quotation marks ( “………” “Koduvath” ).
- Contact: (+) 9400230025
Registration of a Document Relates Back to the Date when it was Executed
Saji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam Section 47 of The Registration Act, 1908 reads thus:“47. Time from which registered document operates – A registered document shall operate from the time from which it would have commenced to operate if no registration thereof had been required or made, and not from the time of its registration.” Legal effect…
Plea of Easement by Express Grant and Easement of Necessity: Mutually Exclusive and Destructive
If claimed in the alternative, confine to one at least at trial. Saji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam Abstract •• Distinct Legal Origins: The legal foundations for an easement by express grant and an easement of necessity are distinct. An easement of necessity under Section 13 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 arises solely from absolute necessity (i.e.,…
Divergent Decisions of COEQUAL BENCHES and Doctrine of PER INCURIAM
Saji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam Abstract •• The General Law in India: If a judgment is rendered in ignorance of an earlier decision of a co-equal (coordinate) Bench, it will be ‘per incuriam’. Such decisions will not have any precedential value or binding force on any subsequent decision. (Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India, (2024)…
Principles of Rejection of Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC
Saji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam. Part I Principles of Rejection of Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC The principles of rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is authoritatively laid down in Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali, (2020) 7 SCC 366. It can be summarised as under: Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra),…
Adjournment of Election Meetings of Associations and of Polling
Saji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam. AbstractThe right to adjourn a meeting is vested in the assembly itself unless there are particular regulations which vest this power in the chairman. If voting has not started, generally there will be no difficulty in postponing/adjourning the election to another date, provided the constitution/bye-laws or the authority conducting the election permits…
Suit and Counterclaim: Supreme Court held in Basudev v. Sanjay Kumar – No Necessity of Two Decrees; No Need for Two Appeals
Saji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam. Abstract • The Supreme Court of India, in Basudev v. Sanjay Kumar (11 August, 2026), 2026 INSC 831, considered following questions – (i) Whether in every situation where a suit and a counterclaim are disposed of by a single judgment, two decrees should be drawn up; and(ii) If two decrees were…
Marking Secondary Evidence Without Objection: Two Apparently Divergent Views on Waiver and the Mode of Proof of Documents
Saji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam. Introspection The Supreme Court of India indisputably makes it clear — where a secondary evidence is sought to be admitted on the basis of an admission (by the opposite party), such admission must be either – The Supreme Court has authoritatively held that the mere marking of a document in evidence—in…
Kannan v. Adisiva (2026) Requires Reconsideration: Section 465 CrPC Appears to Have Been Misread
Saji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam. Part 1 Section 465 of the Code of Criminal Procedure reads as follows: “465. Finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity — (1) Subject to the provisions hereinbefore contained, no finding, sentence or order passed by a Court of competent jurisdiction shall be reversed or altered by a Court…
Suit Dismissed for Default: No Appeal Lies—Only Restoration under Order IX Rule 13 CPC; If the Restoration Petition is Dismissed for Default, it too can be Restored
Saji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam. Legal Propositions in a Nutshell Restoration Petition Dismissed for Default. Application to restore it is akin to O 9, r 9 The Supreme Court, in Jaswant Singh v. Parkash Kaur, AIR 2017 SC 5275; 2018-12 SCC 249, held as under: Referring Jaswant Singh v. Parkash Kaur : AIR 2017 SC 5275,…
Contours of ‘Bona Fide Requirement’ in Recovery Proceedings under Rent Control Enactments
Saji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam. The Supreme Court of India examined the contours of ‘bona fide requirement’, in Recovery Proceedings under Rent Control Enactments, in Madan Mohan v. Thakar Dass, July 21, 2026, 2026 INSC 730 (Sanjay Karol, Augustine George Masih, JJ.), as under:
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
Follow My Blog
Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.